1 (6.66666%)
EBP title slide present with the requisite elements
Points:
0.95 (6.33333%)
EBP title present but missing 1 of the requisite elements
Points:
0.9 (6.00%)
EBP title present but missing 2 of the requisite elements
Points:
0.85 (5.66666%)
EBP title missing
PICOT Research Question Slide
Points:
1 (6.66666%)
EBP question posed with rationale
Points:
0.95 (6.33333%)
EBP question posed
Points:
0.9 (6.00%)
Incomplete EBP question
Points:
0.85 (5.66666%)
EBP question missing
PICOT Slide
Points:
2 (13.33333%)
All relevant PICOT elements addressed
Points:
1.95 (13.00%)
Most of the relevant PICOT elements addressed
Points:
1.9 (12.66666%)
Several PICOT elements not addressed
Points:
1.85 (12.33333%)
PICOT elements not addressed
Literature Search Strategy Slide
Points:
1 (6.66666%)
All elements of search described
Points:
0.95 (6.33333%)
Most elements of search described
Points:
0.9 (6.00%)
Minimal description of search described
Points:
0.85 (5.66666%)
Did not address
Articles
Points:
4 (26.66666%)
Selected two articles: qualitative and a quantitative article appropriate for EBP research question. Includes all elements outlined outlined in the Grading Guidelines and EBP Template.
Points:
3.95 (26.33333%)
Selected two articles: qualitative and quantitative appropriate for EBP research question. Missing 1-2 elements outlined in Grading Guidelines and EBP Template.
Points:
3.9 (26.00%)
One article missing. Article appropriate for the EBP research question. Missing 3-4 elements outlined in Grading Guidelines and EBP Template.
Points:
3.85 (25.66666%)
One article missing. Article appropriate for the EBP research question. Missing multiple elements outlined in Grading Guidelines and EBP Template.
Methodology Slide
Points:
1 (6.66666%)
Appropriate for question. Lists the methodology strategy outlined in Grading Guidelines
Points:
0.95 (6.33333%)
Appropriate for question. Lists the methodology but missing strategy outlined in Grading Guidelines
Points:
0.9 (6.00%)
Marginally appropriate for question as outlined in Grading Guidelines
Points:
0.85 (5.66666%)
Methodology listed but not appropriate for the research question
Participants Slide
Points:
1 (6.66666%)
Participants appropriate for question and includes information as outlined in Grading Guidelines
Points:
0.95 (6.33333%)
Participants appropriate for question but missing 1-2 items outlined in the Grading Guidelines.
Points:
0.9 (6.00%)
Participants appropriate for question but is missing 2-3 items outlined in the Grading Guidelines
Points:
0.85 (5.66666%)
Participants appropriate or not appropriate for question or is missing 4 or more items outlined in the Grading Guidelines
Data Collection Slide
Points:
1 (6.66666%)
Data collection appropriate for question
Points:
0.95 (6.33333%)
Data collection appropriate for question but not adequate
Points:
0.9 (6.00%)
Data collection marginally appropriate for question
Points:
0.85 (5.66666%)
Data collection not appropriate for question
Data Analysis Slide
Points:
1 (6.66666%)
Data analysis appropriate for question
Points:
0.95 (6.33333%)
Data analysis appropriate for question but not adequate.
Points:
0.9 (6.00%)
Data analysis marginally appropriate for question
Points:
0.85 (5.66666%)
Data analysis not appropriate for question
References Slide
Points:
2 (13.33333%)
References listed. Used APA 7th edition with no errors
Points:
1.95 (13.00%)
References. Used APA 7th edition with one error
Points:
1.9 (12.66666%)
References listed. Used APA 7th edition with two errors
Points:
1.85 (12.33333%)
References listed. Used APA 7th edition with three or more errors
Name:Evidence-Based Practice Project Presentation
Description:Evidence-Based Practice Project Presentation Rub
