Description
This assessment needs to be a 2:1 standard or higher. it needs to be 2750 MAX
no bibliography needed or footnotes!
no quotes and everything HAS to be original words!
ARIAL AND SIZE 12
there are two questions from PART A that need to be answered:
(they are highlighted in the document below)
3) ‘The approach taken by the Court of Justice to the doctrine of Supremacy of Union law has not been accepted without question by the courts of the Member States’.
Critically analyse this statement with reference to at least one Member State (you may select the UK).
max words for this question is 915 words! HOWEVER if you do not need all the words for the question you can use the word count for another question.
must also include relevant case law, legislation and academic commentary, where appropriate.
4) ‘The EU’s level of fundamental rights protection has increased consistently over the years, arriving at its pinnacle today.’
Critically analyse this statement.
max words for this question is 915 words! HOWEVER if you do not need all the words for the question you can use the word count for another question.
must also include relevant case law, legislation and academic commentary, where appropriate.
ANSWER EACH QUESTION ON A SEPARATE PAGE
Need to answer one question from Part B
(it is highlighted in the document attached below)
Part B
question 5)
The rights of EU citizens and their families under the Citizens’ Directive and case-law are extensive, but those who qualify as a “worker” under Article 45 TFEU have even greater rights.’
Discuss this statement with reference to relevant legal provisions and case law by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
max words for this question is 915 words! HOWEVER if you do not need all the words for the question you can use the word count for another question.
must also include relevant case law, legislation and academic commentary, where appropriate.
