The Effectiveness of Telemedicine Monitoring on Glycaemic and Adherence
among Type 2 Diabetes Authors
Abstract

(Maximum – 250 words for Protocols/500 words for Reviews)
Objective: State an overarching review objective structured using the key components of the inclusion criteria (approximately one or two sentences). e.g. The objective of this Rapid review is to The objective of this review is to identify, evaluate the evidence of telehealth management of patients with type 2 Diabetes. ( you can make it better )

Introduction: Briefly describe the rationale for the review in light of what is already known on the topic (approximately two to three sentences).
Inclusion criteria: Summarize the inclusion criteria using the participants, concept, and context (PCC framework) and highlight any relevant exclusions in paragraph format. Present the information in one to three sentences – NOT under individual subheadings. ( my inclusion criteria were systematic review and randomise control trial which study the impact of Telemedicine Monitoring on Glycaemic and Adherence among adult Type 2 Diabetes) exclusion criteria study which was based on type one diabetes or on geriatric population )

Methods : I will write this part .

Results : The bulk of the abstract should be reserved to convey the main results of the review in relation to the objective/question. Report the number and type of included evidence as well as any pertinent study characteristics.
Conclusions (For Reviews ONLY): Provide a conclusion based on a general interpretation of the review findings in line with the review’s objective/s and any limitations of the review. Briefly convey key implications of the findings for practice and research (if any).

Introduction

Guidance for authors: Describe the rationale for the review considering what is already known on the topic, including information that supports and justifies the selection of inclusion criteria. Key terms should be defined, and operational definitions narratively explained. Furthermore, provide some indication that there is evidence available that will meet your inclusion criteria. A rationale as to why a rapid review was the most appropriate method should also be provided. (Approximately 1000 words).
Edit set text as appropriate:
A preliminary search of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, , Ovid and PsychINFO add that I don’t have access to EMBASE data base .

Guidance for authors: If there are any existing systematic reviews/rapid reviews, it should be specified how the proposed review will differ.
Guidance for authors: Conclude with an overarching review objective, that captures and aligns with the core elements/PCC framework of the inclusion criteria (e.g. The objective of this rapid review is to assess the extent of the literature evidence of telehealth management of patients with type 2 Diabetes
Review question
What is the impact of monitoring the glycaemic control of patients with type II diabetes in virtual and telemedicine clinical settings? You can revised it to make it better