The Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Program was implemented as part of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Act of 1990. Read the following two documents highlighting the original intent and current debate surrounding the PFC Program:
Airline Passenger Facility Charges: What Do They Mean for an Ailing Industry by S. Imes/Journal of Air Law and Commerce (Links to an external site.)
Op-Ed: Should Passenger Facility Charges Be Increased?/Airways Magazine (Links to an external site.)
Prepare a case analysis titled: “PFCs: Pros or Cons – Should They Be Raised to Pay for 21st Century Airport Infrastructure?”
ASCI 254 6.2 COA UG Case Analysis Rubric V2 (1)
ASCI 254 6.2 COA UG Case Analysis Rubric V2 (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary
Should provide a sufficient summary and develop a central theme that is organized.
10 pts
Exceeds Standards
8 pts
Meets Standards
7 pts
Does Not Meet Standards
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem Statement
Should clearly and succinctly identify and isolate as assigned, the problem/s or issue/s.
20 pts
Exceeds Standards
17 pts
Meets Standards
14 pts
Does Not Meet Standards
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSignificance of the Problem
Should present a valid argument with reference to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks; Fully supports the Problem Statement; Should exhibit thoughtfulness, and make some effort towards predicting outcomes.
20 pts
Exceeds Standards
17 pts
Meets Standards
14 pts
Does Not Meet Standards
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAlternative Actions (Two Each)
Should succinctly state an approach to resolving the problem/s or issue/s. Reasons for each alternative are included in the described alternative. Advantages and disadvantages should be present. Outcome of implementing one alternative or the other may be present. A decision could possibly be made based upon the information provided.
20 pts
Exceeds Standards
17 pts
Meets Standards
14 pts
Does Not Meet Standards
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendation
A somewhat realistic approach to resolving the problem should be provided. Reason is provided. An advantage and disadvantage should be present. Outcome of implementation is positive. A decision could possibly be made based upon the information provided.
10 pts
Exceeds Standards
8 pts
Meets Standards
7 pts
Does Not Meet Standards
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
Citations, references present where applicable and IAW APA. Mechanics of style should enhance content understanding, and writing skillfully supports the message.
10 pts
Exceeds Standards
8 pts
Meets Standards
7 pts
Does Not Meet Standards
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccomplishment of Research Learning Outcomes
The case analysis should accomplish some of the 6 SLO’s for Research in support of the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan.
10 pts
Exceeds Standards
8 pts
Meets Standards
7 pts
Does Not Meet Standards
10 pts
Total Points: 100
