Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Which is the more compelling argument in favor of universal jurisdiction, no safe haven’ or ‘global enforcer’ conception?

International Criminal Law

Question 1:

Which is the more compelling argument in favor of universal jurisdiction, no safe haven’ or ‘global enforcer’ conception?

Question 2:

What are reasonable standards one could use to evaluate whether a norm has become customary international law? A preemptory norm?