Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

What are they different “Virtue Ethics” and “Killing and Allowing to Die”.

Words: 525
Pages: 2
Subject: Ethics

This is going to be talking about “Virtue Ethics” and “Killing and Allowing to Die” and what the differences and similarities. “Virtue Ethics” and “Killing and Allowing to Die” are two different ethical dilemmas/problems but are both ethical dilemmas.

“Virtue Ethics” talks about the way people try to be good and how they try to be good. It also talks a bit about Aristotle, who was one of Plato’s students. “For Aristotle, the good human life had all these ingredients. A good human being was virtuous in the sense that he embodied all the excellences of human character. What is virtue ethics? It’s where you make your decision about what’s moral based on vitrines. What would Virtus be good, kind, honest and it’s about just being a good person. In “Killing and Allowing to Die” direct action of a person who is the cause of someone dying, like if someone shoots another person. If someone die from something that isn’t cause by humans. “The purpose of the distinction has been to separate those deaths caused by human action, and those caused by nonhuman events.” If someone gets shoot then dies the person (person one) who shouted them killed them. If someone doesn’t help or saves someone who let’s just say got hurt and they could die from that but another person (person two) can save them, if person two doesn’t want to save them or won’t save them then it would be as person two killing person one. Just because person two didn’t hurt person one doesn’t mean they didn’t have a helping hand in killing them or in other words letting them die.

How do they go together / the similarities. In “Virtue Ethics” and “Killing and Allowing to Die” both talks about ethical dilemmas or problems. “Virtue Ethics” talks about doing the right thing at the right time for the right reason and “Killing and Allowing to Die” just talks about is it the same if someone allow another person to die the same as killing someone. They both talk about what should be the right to be in different ethical dilemmas. They also talk about how all ethical dilemmas need to be handled differently depending on the dilemmas. So, someone could say that these go hand and hand with each other.

What are they different “Virtue Ethics” and “Killing and Allowing to Die”. They both talk about ethical dilemmas but are two different types of ethical dilemma. “Virtue Ethics” is mainly talks about how someone can be a better person and what is right, but “Killing and Allowing to Die” talks about if allowing someone to die is the same as killing that person. “Killing and Allowing to Die” has a heavier topic than “Virtue Ethics” does, but it goes into how doing the right thing for the right reason at the right time is more emotional than “Virtue Ethics”.

This is the differences and similarities of “Virtue Ethics” and “Killing and Allowing to Die” and what both of them are about. They both something that is similarities and differences.