Assignment Question

I’m working on a psychology discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. This is a 2 part assignment. (2 Discussion Questions) 1. Watch the videos of Drs Perls and Rogers and compare and contrast the sessions. 2. Please discuss which holistic approaches to counseling you prefer and why.

Answer

Dr. Fritz Perls and Dr. Carl Rogers represent two significant schools of thought in the field of psychology and counseling. Let’s delve deeper into the comparison of their therapy sessions, focusing on their underlying assumptions and techniques:

Dr. Fritz Perls

Existential and Gestalt Therapy: Dr. Perls is associated with Gestalt therapy, which falls under the broader category of existential therapy. This approach is grounded in the belief that individuals have the capacity for self-awareness and personal responsibility. Perls emphasizes the “here and now” and encourages clients to fully experience their thoughts, feelings, and sensations in the present moment (Perls, 2019).

Emphasis on Self-Integration: In Gestalt therapy, the ultimate goal is self-integration, where individuals become whole by acknowledging and embracing all aspects of themselves, including their strengths and vulnerabilities. Perls often employs techniques like role-playing, the empty chair exercise, and the “topdog-underdog” dialogue to facilitate this self-discovery process (Perls, 2019).

Confrontation and Awareness: Perls uses a confrontational approach to therapy. He challenges clients to confront their internal conflicts and unresolved issues. By doing so, he helps them gain awareness of their defense mechanisms and how these defenses may hinder personal growth (Perls, 2019).

Dr. Carl Rogers

Client-Centered Approach: Dr. Rogers is known for his person-centered therapy, which is characterized by its non-directive and empathetic nature. The core assumption is that individuals have an innate drive toward self-actualization and personal growth when placed in a supportive environment (Rogers, 2020).

Unconditional Positive Regard: Rogers introduced the concept of “unconditional positive regard,” which means that the therapist accepts and values the client without judgment. This attitude of genuine care and empathy fosters a safe space for clients to explore their thoughts and emotions (Rogers, 2020).

Reflective Listening: Rogers extensively employs reflective listening, where he mirrors the client’s feelings and thoughts. This technique helps clients gain clarity about their own experiences and emotions. It also contributes to building trust and rapport (Rogers, 2020).

Comparison and Contrast

• Therapist’s Role: One of the fundamental differences between these approaches is the role of the therapist. Perls takes on a more directive and confrontational role, whereas Rogers adopts a non-directive, client-centered approach. Perls actively challenges and guides the client, while Rogers provides a nurturing and empathetic presence.
• Time Orientation: Gestalt therapy focuses on the present moment, encouraging clients to explore immediate thoughts and emotions. In contrast, person-centered therapy is future-oriented, aiming to help clients achieve personal growth over time.
• Techniques: Perls employs techniques such as role-playing, empty chair exercises, and psychodrama, which are designed to bring suppressed emotions and unresolved conflicts to the surface. Rogers primarily uses reflective listening and empathy to facilitate self-exploration.
• Worldview: While both approaches acknowledge the potential for personal growth, their underlying worldviews differ. Perls’ existential perspective emphasizes the “here and now” and the importance of resolving past issues. Rogers’ humanistic perspective centers on the belief that individuals naturally strive for self-actualization when provided with the right conditions.

Preferred Holistic Approaches to Counseling 

Holistic counseling approaches consider the interconnectedness of an individual’s physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being. Here, we’ll explore Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) and Integrative Body-Mind Training (IBMT) in more detail:

Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)

• Combination of Cognitive Therapy and Mindfulness: MBCT combines elements of cognitive therapy, which focuses on identifying and changing thought patterns, with mindfulness techniques. It’s particularly effective in preventing relapse in individuals with recurrent depression. MBCT helps clients develop a mindful awareness of their thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations.
• Stress Reduction: MBCT equips individuals with stress reduction techniques, allowing them to better manage their emotional responses to stressors. The practice of mindfulness enables clients to cultivate a non-judgmental attitude towards their experiences.
• Emphasis on Self-Management: MBCT empowers clients to take an active role in managing their mental and emotional well-being. It equips them with tools to navigate the challenges of life more effectively.

Integrative Body-Mind Training (IBMT)

• Mind-Body Harmony: IBMT is rooted in traditional Chinese medicine and emphasizes achieving harmony between the body and mind. It incorporates mindfulness and meditation practices to induce a state of relaxation and balance (Tang, 2020).
• Stress Reduction and Well-Being: IBMT is effective in reducing stress and promoting overall well-being. It guides individuals in releasing tension, improving sleep quality, and enhancing their mental clarity (Tang, 2020).
• Non-Religious and Universal: Unlike some mindfulness practices that may have religious associations, IBMT is non-religious and accessible to people from various cultural backgrounds. It focuses on universal principles of relaxation and balance (Tang, 2020).

Both MBCT and IBMT align with holistic counseling principles by recognizing that mental and emotional well-being are intimately connected to physical health. These approaches equip individuals with tools for self-awareness, stress reduction, and overall well-being, promoting a balanced and harmonious life.

In conclusion, the comparison of Drs. Perls and Rogers’ therapy sessions highlights the diverse approaches in the field of counseling. The preference for a particular holistic counseling approach depends on individual client needs and the therapist’s philosophy. MBCT and IBMT are valuable choices for those seeking a holistic approach to well-being, and they can complement traditional therapy methods by addressing the interconnected aspects of mind, body, and spirit.

References

• Perls, F. (2019). Fritz Perls – Gestalt Therapy.
• Rogers, C. (2020). Client-Centered Therapy.
• Tang, Y. (2020). The Neuroscience of Mindfulness Meditation: How the Body and Mind Work Together.

FAQs

1. What are the key differences between Dr. Fritz Perls’ Gestalt therapy and Dr. Carl Rogers’ person-centered therapy?
   • Keywords: differences, Gestalt therapy, person-centered therapy.
2. How do Fritz Perls and Carl Rogers’ therapeutic approaches differ in terms of the therapist’s role and techniques used?
   • Keywords: therapist’s role, therapeutic techniques, comparison.
3. Why does Gestalt therapy focus on the “here and now,” while person-centered therapy is future-oriented?
   • Keywords: focus, time orientation, therapeutic approaches.
4. Can you explain the core principles of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) and Integrative Body-Mind Training (IBMT) in holistic counseling?
   • Keywords: MBCT, IBMT, holistic counseling, core principles.
5. Which holistic counseling approach is more suitable for managing stress and promoting overall well-being, MBCT or IBMT?
   • Keywords: holistic counseling, stress management, well-being, comparison.