Answer the questions regarding the specific case. Do not copy. Paraphrase and use your own words to answer.
1. List the facts relevant to whether Gail and/or William Johnson’s were protected by the First Amendment.
2. Summarize the Commonwealth’s arguments that the Johnsons’ and their friend’s conduct was cyberharassment.
3. Summarize the Johnsons’ arguments that their conduct was protected speech.
Textbook:
Samaha, Joel. Criminal Law (p. 54). Cengage Learning. Kindle Edition.
