Critically analyze the post of a student in the other group and post your analysis under that student’s thread. What questions still remain? What did you not understand? Does this appear to be the student’s own words or just copying of information?
Briefly summarize the student’s post and then critique and analyze the post
commenting on what was well done and why, what is unclear and why, what is missing, and why the commenting student feels it should have been included. How could the post be improved?
The post is on the Michael Drejka case. Information on the case can be found at the link below.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/10/us/florida-trial-michael-drejka-sentencing/index.html
