Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support for premises in these scholarly sources contrasted with non-scholarly sources.

 

  • Read the assigned sections of Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 in your textbook:
    • 5.1: Basic Concepts in Inductive Reasoning
    • 5.2: Statistical Arguments: Statistical Syllogisms
    • 5.3: Statistical Arguments: Inductive Generalizations
    • 5.6: Arguments from Authority
    • 5.7: Arguments from Analogy
    • Chapter 5 Summary
    • 6.4: Reasoning About Science: The Hypothetico-Deductive Method
    • 6.5: Inference to the Best Explanation
  • Watch the videos:
    • What Is a “STRONG” argument
    • What Is an Inductive Argument
    • Inductive Reasoning
    • Inference to the Best Explanation
    • Write a paper that includes the following:
      Introduction (approximately 100 words)

      • Explain your topic and state the specific question that you are addressing.
    • Presentation of an Argument (approximately 200 words)
      • Describe the scholarly source on one side of the issue.
      • Present what you see as the main argument from that source (present the argument in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion).
    • Evaluation of the quality of the reasoning in this source (approximately 200 words)
      You may address questions such as the following:

      • How adequately does the article support the premises of the argument?
      • How strongly do the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion?
      • What (if any) missing premises would be needed to complete the argument (make it valid/strong)? Are these missing premises justified or merely assumptions?
    • Presentation of an Opposing Argument (approximately 200 words)
      • Describe the scholarly source on the other side of the issue.
      • Present what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion.
    • Evaluation of the quality of the reasoning in this source (approximately 200 words)
      You may address questions such as the following:

      • How adequately does the article support the premises of the argument?
      • How strongly do the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion?
      • What (if any) missing premises would be needed to complete the argument (make it valid/strong)? Are these missing premises justified or merely assumptions?
    • Evaluation of Arguments in Non-Scholarly and Scholarly Sources (approximately 100 words)
      • Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support for premises in these scholarly sources contrasted with non-scholarly sources.